Morality depends on God’s command Essay

Hu bits, from the cradle to the grave, atomic number 18 taught to respect federation and its homophiley an new(prenominal)(prenominal) pre-existing patchifold systems, oft with no rhyme nor reason. How can cardinal in truth know what, and if, social systems argon unspoilt to them, when wholeness is draw ind to live under the awake(p) eye of the alliance who ca-cad these systems, and wish them to continue? inquisitive federation is something that is reserved for those who wish for break down systems than the iodins they were given, ones that entrust serve to improve the valet de chambre take. However, society often neglects these difficult questions, accepting kind of easy answers, normally accepted and passed down through the generations. Within the bourn of a questionable society arises homos who apply their lives to the searching for answers to these questions, in hopes of providing human being racekind with a better understanding of its place. Philosoph ers are the title bestowed upon these individuals, and one much(prenominal) philosopher who searched for truth, was Karl Marx.Karl Marx was a philosopher who interpreted the world, and through his interpretations, he succeeded in changing it. Whether or not it was for the better or the worse, remains discussion amongst umpteen scholars. Among his many philosophic observations were organized religion is a face of illusion, that history itself is running(a) and progressive. He also supported wo manpowers acquittance and stated that an important aspiration of improving the human condition to be achieved by creating a raw(a) type of society for everyone. A unsanded society for everyone would mean the abolition of the old. It was this extremist nature of his doctrine which created a fear among those few who were, and those who still are, in power. Marx was a fervent supporter of social criticism, and he believed that the criticism of religion was the bring in of all criticis m. In his view, he found it to be a type of illusion. Marx borrowed his religious philosophies from Feuerbach who wrote that man serves religion, not vice-versa, and in creating god in his own image, had alienated himself from himself (Marx, 1978/1848, p. 53). This meant that man had created a greater existence in contrast to himself, cut down himself to a despicable creature who needed twain the dogma of the church and the laws of govern manpowert to guide and assert him.Marx agreed with this philosophy and described religion as the, sigh of the oppressed creature, the senti handst of a obdurate world, the soul of soulless conditions, adding that religion was the opium of the pack (1978/1848, p. 54). Marx believed that the human condition causes people to create illusions, religion being one, which create a false happiness. He called for people to abandon their illusions and demand for their real happiness. The criticism of religion created an awareness as to its illusory n ature, and Marx mat strongly that man should be able to create an illusion-free existence, relying instead on his reason.To Marx, religion prohibits man from realizing himself as the philia of his existence, an in place, creates an environment in which religious sentiment dictates his action. Men can never be free, as wide as they accept their existence as subservient beings, indebted to a omnipotent arrogant being. Religion is a tradition which has survived the ages, though invariably changing to suit the times. Events such as the Reformation, or the Great Schism, only serve to support this, for religion, akin all things man-made, is only employ if it is a utilitarian part of society. Marx believed that if religion were abolished human beings would overcome their self-inflicted alienation. The renunciation of this illusion, in Marxs view, could be one of many crucial steps mankind towards advancement.Marx believed that humans could go up meaning in history, which he beli eved to be analog and progressive. He saw history as the anthesis of human body struggles, between the owners of the productive forces, middle class, and the workers, proletariat. With his conception of history, Marx used scientific observation to show how history was really the history of performance. He set human existence as being the first premise in history. Humans essential live to create history, so he showed how humans survive, by producing useful things out of natural actual.Through this he showed how man is the producer, and by using natural materials, he created a new man-made nature over the original. This material conception of history is base on Hegels conception of history, along with Feurerbachs criticism of it, however whereas Hegel claims man to be a self-alienating spirit, Feurerbach claims man to be self-alienating in its own, and the spirit Hegel speaks of, is actually the belief military operation taking place in the mind. Marx argued that this hum an thought was determined by social and economic forces, curiously those related to the means of production.He explains that the ruling class of each historic period, is the class that controls the material force of society, and their ideas prevail. The goals or ideals of each earlier generation, he points out, are only formed by the later generations based the influence the prior generations had. This led Marx to develop a method of analysis called Dialectical Materialism, in which the concussion of historical forces leads to changes in society.He also say that all history is the history of class struggles, whether it be the slave-master relationship of earlier ages, or the employee-employer relationship of today. Marx denotative history as the process of human self-development, and criticized the vernacular economic system of Capitalism. He claimed that Capitalism must be abandoned in favor of a better economic system. He also felt this would happen, for he believed man to b e capable of such a development.What, according to Marx, is the ripe(p) life? why is it unattainable under capitalism? Critically die Marxs views.Marx believed that the important goal of improving the human condition to create the good life was to be achieved by creating a new type of society for everyone. Marx claimed that in a Capitalist society, which still remains the closely parking area economic system, the struggle between the working(a) class, or proletariat, and the ruling business class, or bourgeoisie, would eventually end in the formation of a new society, a egalitarian society. Society can no longer live under this bourgoeisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society, sated Marx his work, manifesto of the Communist Party (1978/1848, p. 483). To Marx, the good life was impossible under a capitalist system.Marx points out how human history has delivered its fortune of class struggles turned to revolutions, and the bourgeoisie society will be no different. In his writings, he often uses the French Revolution as an example, citing the uprising of the bourgeoisie against the former feudal society. The one constant in the history of man has been the detail that some men have what other men wish too have, unless do not. This puts man in competition with each other, and this leads to struggle amongst man, kind of than cooperation amongst man. This consequently leads men to feel separated from others, by the share fact that they become opposing forces.Marx utilise this idea of alienation to toffee-nosed property, which he say causes humans to work only for themselves, not for the good of their species. Because Capitalism has its roots in private ownership, he felt that it created an environment, ripe for greed and avarice to develop. This prevents man from focusing on cooperating, and maximizing their potential. Marx felt that it must be abandoned for the good of the species, and mans continuing development towards skill. The economic system he proposed was a socialist one, or communism. He called for a communist society to overcome the dehumanizing effect of private property.Marxs proposed communist society would be one that would provide for all. Many believe his view on the possibility of communism succeeding was dainty idealism, but he believed that it was crucial for man. By creating a society where man could work together towards a common goal, it would be able to achieve many more than important results. Marx believed that this could help create a classless society in which all men are provided for, and free to endeavor as they please. Certainly, in its pure form, communism seems that it would be able to thrive. However, since its inception, it has developed a negative connotation in many countries, curiously in the United States, which fought a Cold warfare with the hated commies. The failure of the Soviet Union, the Communist attraction in the world, led many to believe that it wa s a system doomed to failure. Despite that, communism and Marxs beliefs in it, were all part of his plan of liberating man, and women as well. Amongst the many little-known facts about the philosophies of Karl Marx, was his support for womens venting in a time when they did not share the privileges of men. He believed that this would encourage greater equality inside societies, therefore making life better for the society as a whole. More than a light speed ago, many years before women were allowed to vote in the United States, Marx wrote of his views towards womens rights. In the modern bourgeoisie society, Marx explained in so many words, that women in a capitalist system were nonentity more to men than another instrument of production.Men, who controlled the world as swell as its productive forces, also controlled women. Because the instruments of production are to be exploited, women are exploited. With the abolition of the bourgeoisie society, women would be free from every form of prostitution, habitual or private. For the Communists, there was, no need to unwrap community of women it has always existed almost from time aged (1978/1848, p. 488) But traditional capitalistic values make this fact all but impossible to notice, and for Marx, womens equality was another step towards human enlightenment and the good life. The philosophies of Karl Marx continue to draw varied opinions. For many years, people who were believed to be communist were persecuted, many in spite of their actual innocence. In the United States, propaganda and political movements against Marxist philosophies, created fear in and ignorance in millions. Perhaps, it is the revolutionary nature of Marxist philosophy that has many men of power frightened. Perhaps, an educated and motivated working class, with nothing too lose but their shackles, is something which causes fear in those who have everything too lose. Anyone with common sense would be able to see the benefits of helping o ur fellow man, and the benefits of pooling our joint talents towards a common goal. But as long as people continue to accept their oppression, the goal of enlightenment grows more distant. WORKING MEN OF all told COUNTRIES, UNITE (1978/1848, p. 500).Works CitedMarx, K. (1978/1848). Communist Manifesto. The Marx-Engels Reader. Trans. Tucker, R. C.,Second Edition. natural York W. W. Norton.